Close this Window
|
Close this Window
|
|
| Lawyer II: | Your Honour, notwithstanding the proposal of this court, as such which shall be referred to, hoc facto as "the proposal", I move that the Defendant, being before us and referred to as "the Defendant", be charged with the crime of "crimen laesae majestatis". Witnesseth that "the Defendant", having ascertained his complacency in this charge, must be sentenced (said slowly) "ad stam aut culpam". (He looks with satisfaction at the court. He grabs the bone and gesticulates wildly with it). Hereunder is Exhibit A which henceforth shall be known as "Exhibit A". As the discovery of Exhibit A is very a propas too, a "capias" was laid to being in the aforementioned "Defendant" as iterum. Now I am not nolle prosequi, for I have been told that I have a furor loquendi, but notwithstanding, I call on this court, pro bono publico, to follow the precedent of "Lex Talionis" in the Aemilianus Case 1683, "Carthago delenda est". Non est disputandum. (He laughs at his own joke, then coughs). I now invite Your Honour to inspect the evidence. |